globe icon
Available for EU residents

Hive5 Review

Updated | 12. March 2025

globe icon
Available for EU residents
shield icon
not secured
chart icon

Information:

Hive5 is a high-risk platform that investors should approach with caution.

0
rating
tested badge
Tested Platform
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Questionable marketing strategies

  • Conflict of interest

  • Limited diversification

  • Not regulated

RATING
Risk & Returnnumber of stars
Usabilitynumber of stars
Liquiditynumber of stars
Supportnumber of stars
FEATURES
checked iconBuyback Guarantee
checked iconAuto Invest
checked iconCashback
closed iconSecondary Market
closed iconRegulated
DIVERSIFICATION
Min. Investment 10
Loan Originators3
Loan Period in Months -
Countries3
Loan TypeShort-Term
Interest14% - 16%

Statistics

wallet
Outstanding portfolio:€10.780,000
graph image
Performing portfolio:Not available
graph image
Non-performing portfolio:Not available
N/A
N/A
arrow image

Investors' earnings:

Not available

arrow down image

Loss of investors' money:

Not available

graph image

Average portfolio size:

Not available

calendar image

Year founded:

2022

user image

Number of investors:

Not available

Portfolio Evaluation:

We consider Hive5's statistical data unreliable. The platform lacks transparency, as it does not disclose critical performance data, which increases the risk for potential investors.

Disclaimer:

This statistical information has been sourced from the platform's website and we cannot independently verify its authenticity. Therefore, we recommend conducting your own research, staying updated on the company's latest developments, and reading our Hive5 review to enhance your understanding of the platform. Be aware that geopolitical risks, regulations, and force majeure events may negatively impact your portfolio.

    Table of contents

Table of contents

Disclaimer

This Hive5 review is based on aggregated information from various online sources, including rethink-p2p and smartlendinghub.com. We do not actively monitor Hive5, nor are we affiliated with the platform.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information on, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the details presented.

In our opinion Hive5 does not represent a serious investment opportunity for our readers. We do not take responsibility for any investment decisions made based on this information. If you wish to learn more about Hive5 and its potential risks, please continue reading.

Hive5 Review Summary

Hive5 is a peer-to-peer lending marketplace launched in 2022, offering high-yield loans with returns up to 16%. The platform is unregulated, operates out of Croatia and Lithuania, and primarily funds short-term consumer and business loans. Investors benefit from a 60-day buyback guarantee, but concerns around management transparency, insider conflicts, and past failed ventures raise serious red flags.

What is Hive5

Hive5 connects investors with loans originated by affiliated lending companies. The minimum investment is €10, and an auto-invest feature makes portfolio management simple. However, all loan originators are tied to Hive5’s founders, creating potential conflicts of interest. The platform claims profitability, yet financial reports tell a different story.

Pros

  • High return (up to 16%)
  • Short-term loans (1-6 months) for fast liquidity
  • €10 minimum investment 
  • Buyback guarantee for defaulted loans
  • User-friendly platform

Cons

  • Not regulated
  • Ties to a failed P2P platform Credon
  • All loan originators are insider-owned - potential risk
  • Aggressive marketing tactics - paid reviews & censorship
  • No secondary market - liquidity risk

Our Opinion Of Hive5

Hive5 offers high returns but comes with significant risks that, in our view, outweigh the rewards for most investors. While the platform provides ~14% returns on short-term loans, a user-friendly experience, and transparency efforts, it raises major red flags.

Concerns include a lack of regulation, misleading profitability claims, censorship attempts, and conflicts of interest, as insiders hold stakes in the lenders featured on the platform. Its brief track record and rapid growth raise further doubts about sustainability. 

Hive5 is only suitable for highly risk-tolerant investors who can afford potential losses, and we do not consider it a reliable part of a conservative portfolio. Until it secures stronger oversight and proves its stability, caution is advised.

Risk & Return

Hive5 offers high returns of 12–16% annually, significantly above traditional savings and many P2P platforms. Short-term loans allow for frequent reinvestment, compounding returns if loans perform as expected.

However, these high returns come with elevated risks, particularly borrower defaults and reliance on loan originators’ buyback guarantees.

If an originator becomes insolvent, investors may face losses. Hive5 itself is a young, unregulated platform with past financial losses, raising concerns about its long-term stability. While short-term loans provide flexibility, investors must weigh the potential for high returns against risks such as platform failure, counterparty insolvency, and lack of investor protections.

Is Hive5 Safe?

Safety is a major concern when it comes to P2P platforms like Hive5, and it should be stated upfront: Hive5 is not a “safe” investment in the sense of a bank savings account or a regulated investment fund. It involves substantial risk, and potential investors need to be comfortable with that. Here are the key points regarding Hive5’s safety:

Regulation and Oversight

Hive5 is not regulated by any financial authority. The company is registered in Croatia, but it does not hold a crowdfunding license or other investment license there (Croatia’s regulator HANFA does not oversee Hive5’s activities)​.

This means Hive5 operates in a legal gray zone using contract law and has obtained legal opinions to justify that it can operate without a license​. 

The platform has expressed plans to apply for a European Crowdfunding Service Providers (ECSP) license (which would bring it under EU-wide regulation), but so far this has been deferred and not realized​. 

Without regulatory oversight, there’s no external monitoring of Hive5’s conduct or finances. If Hive5 were to misuse investor funds or become insolvent, there’s no regulator that would step in proactively, nor any investor compensation scheme to reimburse losses. In contrast, a regulated platform (for example, those with an ECSP license) must meet capital requirements, segregation of client funds, regular audits by authorities, and adhere to certain transparency rules.

Hive5 voluntarily does some of these (as we discuss below), but that’s not the same as the assurances of formal regulation. In essence, investors bear more risk on an unregulated platform like Hive5​.

Investor Protections

Since Hive5 isn’t regulated, it is not part of any deposit guarantee or investor protection fund. Any money you invest is not insured by the government or any third party. Hive5 does use certain mechanisms to enhance safety: they perform thorough KYC/AML checks and claim to keep client funds separate (though details aren’t public).

They also underwent independent audits – Hive5 states it gets quarterly financial audits by an external firm (FBP Advise) and that it adheres to GDPR and ISO standards for data security​.

While these measures are good to see, they primarily protect against fraud and data breaches, and ensure the company’s financial statements are reviewed. They do not eliminate the fundamental risks: if loans go bad or if Hive5’s management makes poor decisions, investors can still lose money.

There is also no segregated client account protection law like you have with stock brokers – typically P2P platforms hold uninvested funds in separate accounts at a partner bank, but those might not be protected if the platform fails (depending on the account structure). Always remember that when you wire money to Hive5, it’s leaving the safety of your bank and entering an investment subject to risk.

Operational Transparency:

A concerning aspect of Hive5’s “safety” profile is how the company has handled transparency and criticism. A truly safe and reliable platform is usually one that is very open about its operations and welcomes scrutiny. In Hive5’s case, there have been instances where the platform attempted to suppress negative information – for example, by forcing the removal of a critical review that detailed certain risks​.

Moreover, Hive5’s aggressive solicitation of positive reviews (essentially buying high ratings)​ suggests that the outward image of safety (“4.7 stars on Trustpilot” etc.) might be manufactured rather than earned.

From an investor protection standpoint, these practices are worrisome. They imply that Hive5 may prioritize its reputation over fully candid communication. If a platform isn’t completely transparent during good times, can it be trusted to be upfront during bad times (like if loans start failing or if it’s in financial trouble)?

This erosion of trust is itself a safety issue – not in the sense of hacking or tech, but in the sense of whether you can trust the steward of your money. As one analyst put it, Hive5’s business entanglements and behavior “are not adding to the reputation and ethics of a new P2P platform”​

Loans Safeguards

On the positive side, Hive5’s loans do have the buyback guarantee which is a form of safety net for each individual loan (the originator will compensate you if the borrower defaults)​. Also, most of the loans on Hive5 are unsecured consumer loans, but since they are small and short-term, the historical default rates at least so far appear manageable (and originators have been covering them).

Hive5 does not currently offer additional guarantees like a provision fund or asset collateral on most loans – so the primary safety net is still the originator’s buyback commitment.

Some platforms have extra layers (for example, some real-estate P2P loans are secured by property, or platforms like Income Marketplace have reserve funds for each originator); Hive5’s model keeps it simple: high-interest, short-term loans with a promise from the lending company to cover defaults. That simplicity can work as long as all parties perform, but it lacks a Plan B if an originator fails.

Company Background Check

Another way to gauge safety is to see the background of the people and entities behind Hive5 (discussed in detail in the next sections). There are some red flags in Hive5’s background, including connections to a failed platform and potential conflicts of interest. This doesn’t directly mean Hive5 will fail, but it suggests caution.

The fact that Hive5 felt the need to threaten legal action to hide those connections​ is itself telling. A platform that’s safe and confident in its management should be able to address concerns openly rather than silence them.

Who is Behind Hive5?

Hive5 is operated by a company called Hive5 Marketplace d.o.o., which is part of a broader Hive Finance Group based in Lithuania. The platform was co-founded by two main individuals: Andrius Rupšys and Ričardas Vandzinskas, who also serve as the principal owners. According to official information, Andrius Rupšys holds 65% ownership of the company, and Ričardas Vandzinskas holds 35%​. Here’s a bit about each:

Andrius Rupšys (Co-Founder, majority shareholder): Andrius is a Lithuanian entrepreneur. He is notable for having founded Ruptela, a successful Lithuanian IT/telematics company specializing in fleet management and GPS tracking solutions​. Under his leadership, Ruptela grew into a thriving business (Andrius even earned an award as CEO of the Year in Lithuania).

This background suggests that Andrius has experience in building and scaling a tech company. At Hive5, he is a key stakeholder (though not the CEO).

It’s mentioned in some sources that Andrius’s involvement brings a passion for technology and innovation to the platform​. It’s also worth noting that Andrius Rupšys is relatively young and is the son (or close relative) of a figure we’ll discuss later, Juozas Rupšys, who has been influential in Hive5’s formation​.

Ričardas Vandzinskas (Co-Founder and CEO): Ričardas has a strong finance background, with over 15–17 years of experience in multinational finance, investment management, and corporate governance​.

Before co-founding Hive5, he served in roles like Supervisory Board member and Audit Committee member in financial institutions, which implies a deep understanding of financial oversight and risk management. He also mentors students in finance, indicating a reputable professional standing​. At Hive5, Ričardas is the CEO, handling day-to-day operations and strategy.

Given his background, one would expect Ričardas to emphasize sound financial practices and corporate governance at Hive5. It was Ričardas who often represents Hive5 in interviews and communications to investors.

For example, he has provided information on Hive5’s use of technology and originator partnerships, and he publicly stated in early 2023 that the Hive5 group was on a path to profitability (though that statement turned out premature)​

In terms of reputation, the team on paper has the credentials to run a legitimate P2P platform. However, as we discuss next, there are influential figures behind the scenes and past ventures that cast a shadow. It’s been reported that Juozas Rupšys, a Lithuanian businessman, has been a key figure in the background of Hive5’s creation​.

Juozas is actually the father (or godfather) of Andrius Rupšys and is known for developing Creditonline, a software solution for lending platforms. 

Hive5 is said to utilize Juozas’s software and expertise. While Juozas does not appear as an official director or shareholder of Hive5 now, his involvement is significant enough that it’s part of the discussion around who’s behind Hive5. This is important because Juozas has a controversial history in the P2P space.

Relationship Between Hive5, Juozas Rupšys, and Credon

One of the most critical aspects to examine is the connection between Hive5 and a person named Juozas Rupšys, as well as a defunct P2P platform called Credon. These relationships raise questions about potential conflicts of interest and the background of Hive5’s management.

Who is Juozas Rupšys?

Juozas Rupšys is a Lithuanian businessman and the father (or possibly godfather, as some sources put it) of Hive5’s majority owner, Andrius Rupšys​. Juozas is known in the fintech lending industry as the developer of Creditonline, a white-label software platform used by many lenders and P2P sites for loan management​.

In other words, he builds the backend systems that can run a P2P lending marketplace or a loan originator’s operations. Juozas has been something of an advisor/mentor in the creation of Hive5 – the Hive5 platform reportedly uses Creditonline’s software, and Juozas’s expertise likely influenced Hive5’s setup​. 

Additionally, Juozas had direct ties to Hive5’s ecosystem: he is the godfather of Andrius Rupšys (the main owner of Hive5) and was even listed as a former shareholder in one of Hive5’s partner loan companies (Argentum Capital in Poland)​. This indicates Juozas was not only technically involved but also financially intertwined with businesses related to Hive5.

What was Credon?

Credon was a P2P lending platform launched in late 2021 (operational in 2022) in Croatia, which turned out to be a fiasco. It was operated by Credon P2P d.o.o. (a Croatian company), and importantly, Juozas Rupšys owned 100% of Credon through a Lithuanian holding company. Credon was marketed as a P2P marketplace similar to Hive5. However, Credon’s life span was very short – it has been described as a semi-professional P2P platform with scam-like characteristics​.

By early 2023, Credon effectively collapsed: the platform stopped allowing withdrawals, citing software maintenance issues, and eventually investors couldn’t get their money out​. It came to light that the CEO of Credon was basically a figurehead who hadn’t been paid for months​, and the company was in financial disarray.

In March 2023, the Croatian Commercial Court opened bankruptcy proceedings against Credon due to unpaid debts​. Credon’s website went offline for a while in May 2023 and later reappeared with a notice that it wasn’t taking new investments​​. Ultimately, Credon was declared insolvent and ordered to be liquidated in mid-2023​.

During the meltdown, Credon sent out bizarre communications to investors from a Gmail address, offering to transfer their funds manually via a shareholder’s personal bank account (a sign that the platform’s accounts were likely empty or frozen)​. This was, in a word, chaos – investors faced losing money, and the entire operation looked highly unprofessional and deceptive.

How does this involve Hive5? The critical link is Juozas Rupšys. Juozas was the owner and orchestrator of Credon, and he is also the behind-the-scenes architect of Hive5. Essentially, Hive5 appears to be a successor or “rebrand” of the Credon venture, involving some of the same people.

The timeline is telling: Credon launched, floundered, and by the first half of 2023 was being wound down. Hive5 launched in late 2022 (while Credon was still technically around) and then started growing in 2023.

It’s almost as if the efforts shifted to Hive5. Indeed, Hive5’s operational company was established by Andrius and Ričardas, but with support from Juozas’s software and connections​. Juozas himself had a stake in Argentum (one of Hive5’s lenders) years back, and his relative is the owner of Hive5 – so the overlap is significant.

This raises a potential conflict of interest and risk: the same person (or family) that was responsible for a failed platform (Credon) is heavily involved in Hive5. If Credon was run in a problematic way, one has to question if Hive5 might suffer a similar fate or at least if the business ethics are questionable.

Hive5’s Response to the Connection: Rather than openly addressing these ties, Hive5’s management tried to distance themselves from Juozas and Credon. Notably, when an independent blogger uncovered and published the cross-connections between Hive5, Juozas Rupšys, and Credon in a review, Hive5 attempted to take legal action to have that information removed​. They specifically wanted to erase mentions linking Juozas (and his Credon history) to Hive5.

They even went so far as to get two YouTube videos discussing these links taken down via reports​. Such actions suggest Hive5 is very wary of being associated with Credon publicly – which, paradoxically, only heightens concern. If everything was above board, one would expect them to acknowledge Juozas’s involvement and explain how “this time it’s different.” Instead, the knee-jerk reaction was to threaten and censor, which is not a reassuring sign.

Conflicts of Interest:

The relationship between Hive5, Juozas, and Credon also extends to the loan originators on Hive5. All the lenders on Hive5’s marketplace are either founded by or linked to the Hive5 team. For example, Ruptela (Lithuanian originator for business loans) is Andrius Rupšys’s own company; Ekspres Pozyczka (Polish originator) is a subsidiary in the Hive Finance group; and other new partners like FinJet in Spain or Credilink in Romania were set up as Hive5 sought expansion​.

This means Hive5 is largely a closed ecosystem – Hive5 isn’t an independent broker matching you with third-party loan companies at arm’s length; it’s more like a group of interrelated companies funneling loans into a platform they control. Juozas Rupšys’s Creditonline and possibly his capital helped spawn many of these lending companies.

This structure can be risky because if one part fails (say the Polish lending arm hits regulatory trouble or defaults), the whole group (and Hive5 investors) could be impacted. It’s all in the family, so to speak. In essence, the Hive5–Juozas–Credon nexus is a major red flag.

Juozas Rupšys’s prior platform, Credon, has all the hallmarks of a failed or potentially scammy project (investors lost access to funds, bankruptcy, etc.)​. The same individual’s know-how and possibly funds seeded Hive5. Investors should weigh this heavily – it doesn’t necessarily mean Hive5 will repeat Credon’s fate, but it calls for extreme caution.

At the very least, Hive5’s credibility is dented by these associations. Before investing, one should ask Hive5 (and themselves): Why did Credon fail and what has fundamentally changed with Hive5? If the answer is not convincing, be prepared for the possibility that Hive5 could face similar issues in the future. Always remember that in P2P, trust and transparency are paramount – if the people behind a platform have a dubious history, that risk ultimately falls on the investor’s shoulders.

Potential Red Flags

Through our research, several red flags emerged regarding Hive5’s operations, management, and transparency. These are issues that potential investors should pay close attention to, as they could indicate deeper problems or future risks. Below is a summary of the most prominent red flags, along with evidence for each:

  • Unregulated Newcomer: Hive5 is an extremely young platform (launched in September 2022) and operates without regulatory supervision​. Being unregulated isn’t uncommon in P2P, but it’s a red flag when combined with other issues, because there’s no watchdog. Hive5’s short track record means it hasn’t proven itself over time, yet it is handling millions of euros in investor funds with no external oversight – a risky combination.
  • Conflicts of Interest (Insider Lenders): All loan originators on Hive5’s marketplace appear to have ownership ties to Hive5’s shareholders​. In fact, there are overlapping shareholders between the Hive5 platform and every lender offering loans there​. This is a conflict of interest: Hive5 essentially could be funding its own sister companies with investor money.

    There’s a risk that credit standards might be compromised to push volume, or that trouble in one entity could cascade to others. Such entanglement is a notable red flag, as truly reputable marketplaces usually strive to keep an arm’s length distance from loan originators (or at least have a variety of independent originators).
  • Opaque Financials and Misleading Statements: Hive5’s CEO claimed publicly that the Hive5 group was already profitable, but financial records showed this was false (the group had a loss of ~€755k in 2022)​.

    Making false or premature claims about financial health is worrying – it suggests either a lack of transparency or an attempt to appear stronger than they are. Additionally, Hive5’s 2023 financial report was delayed and the platform cited “multinational complexities” as a reason​.

    While delays can happen, it is essential for trust that a platform communicates honestly about its finances. The fact that profitability was only achieved in Q1 2024 thanks to one originator’s windfall​ underscores that Hive5’s finances are still fragile. Investors should be wary of overly rosy statements from the company that aren’t backed by audited numbers.
  • Extremely Rapid Growth Claims: Hive5 reported acquiring investors at a pace that seems unusually high relative to its peers, raising questions. For example, it claimed about 4,000 new investors in November 2023 alone, which is an extremely aggressive growth spurt​. To put in context, that number in one month would rival some of the biggest platforms’ growth, which is hard to believe for a newcomer without a large marketing machine or unique product.

    This spike coincided with Hive5’s incentivized Trustpilot campaign, so it’s likely many sign-ups were driven by the €25-for-a-review offer. If growth numbers are being inflated or are artificial, that’s a red flag. Exaggerated user metrics might be used to entice more investors (“everyone is joining, so should you”), but if those users are not truly active or are only there for a quick bonus, it’s not real growth.

    It also raises the question: what happens after the promotional push – will activity drop off? Genuine, steady growth is more sustainable than quick, promotion-driven bumps.
  • Paid Reviews & Marketing Manipulation: As mentioned, Hive5 basically bought positive reviews on Trustpilot to bolster its image, with 89% of its reviews appearing in a short period due to incentives​. While many companies ask happy users for reviews, outright paying cash rewards for any review (implicitly positive) is not a standard or transparent practice. It indicates Hive5 was more interested in optics than organically earned reputation.

    Furthermore, Hive5 spent on numerous sponsored blog posts and YouTube videos, meaning a lot of the content praising Hive5 online is essentially advertising​. Investors reading reviews need to discern which reviews are independent vs. paid. The presence of a coordinated positive PR campaign is a yellow/red flag, because it makes it harder to get an objective read on the platform’s quality. A neutral review that did highlight real issues was reportedly taken down after Hive5 complained​, which is another sign of manipulating public perception. All this implies that Hive5’s stellar online reputation was manufactured, not wholly earned, which should give one pause.
  • Legal Threats to Critics: Perhaps the most glaring red flag is Hive5’s approach to critical coverage. After a critical review connecting Hive5 to Juozas Rupšys and Credon was published, Hive5 sent legal threats to the blogger, attempting to force removal of that content​.

    They also got two YouTube videos on the topic blocked​. Such actions are very unusual in the P2P industry (or any industry) – most legitimate companies address criticism with facts or improvements, not cease-and-desist letters. This behavior suggests an intolerance for transparency and a willingness to intimidate to maintain a clean image. It raises a serious question: what does Hive5 have to hide? When a company resorts to silencing critics, it often means the critics are onto something important.

    For investors, this is a red flag because it indicates that if something were wrong, Hive5’s instinct might be to cover it up rather than openly fix it. That’s dangerous for those trusting the platform with money.
  • Ties to a Failed Platform (Credon): We’ve covered this in detail above, but to reiterate: Hive5’s backers have a history with a failed P2P platform (Credon) that left investors in the lurch​. The fact that Hive5 emerged from the same milieu, with many of the same players (just rearranged), is a structural red flag. It suggests the possibility of repeated mistakes or even a pattern of launching platforms, gathering funds, then shutting down. While we cannot say Hive5 will follow Credon, the association is a major caution sign that should not be overlooked​.

Each of these red flags on its own would be concerning; together, they paint a picture of a platform that requires extreme investor caution. High returns often come with high risk, and these are the risks spelled out.

Potential investors in Hive5 should weigh these issues heavily and consider whether they are comfortable proceeding given these warning signs. In the P2P space, transparency and trustworthiness of management are as important as loan performance – and in Hive5’s case, there are clear warning signs that trust has to be earned carefully (and has been undermined by certain actions). Always do your own due diligence and, if something feels off, don’t ignore that gut feeling.

Usability

Hive5 offers a user-friendly platform with a clean, intuitive interface and a well-structured dashboard displaying key investment data. The loan selection process is straightforward, with filters and detailed loan information enhancing transparency. The auto-invest feature allows hands-off investing by setting parameters like duration, interest rate, and originator.

Deposits and withdrawals are processed quickly, with some users reporting near-instant withdrawals. The platform runs smoothly, is mobile-responsive, and provides essential tools without unnecessary complexity. While lacking a dedicated mobile app and advanced analytics, Hive5 delivers a seamless experience, making it accessible to both beginners and experienced investors.

Liquidity

Hive5 offers decent liquidity due to its short loan terms (mostly 1–3 months), allowing frequent repayments and reinvestment. However, it lacks a secondary market, meaning investors must hold loans until maturity.

Withdrawals are processed quickly once funds are available, typically arriving within a day or two.

The buyback guarantee covers late loans after 60 days, but delays in repayments could temporarily reduce liquidity. In a crisis scenario, liquidity could dry up if Hive5 or its loan originators face financial trouble. To maintain better liquidity, diversifying across loans with staggered terms is recommended.

Support

Hive5’s customer support is generally responsive and helpful, primarily available via email and an online contact form. The platform provides an FAQ section but lacks phone or live chat support. Users report quick responses, often within one business day, with the team efficiently handling issues like account verification and payments.

While support is available in English (and possibly Lithuanian), its availability outside business hours is unclear. Hive5 engages with users through blog updates and interviews, though its crisis communication remains untested. Overall, investors can expect solid support, but testing responsiveness with a question before investing is recommended.

Hive5 Alternatives

While Hive5 offers high returns, it comes with significant risks. If you're looking for more reliable alternatives, consider these options:

Esketit

Esketit stands out as one of the best alternatives to Hive5, with a strong track record, no funds in recovery, and an instant exit option for improved liquidity. Investors can earn between 12% and 13% annually, making it a solid choice for both beginners and experienced investors. Learn more in our Esketit review.

Income Marketplace

Income Marketplace offers up to 15% annual returns and decent loan availability, reducing the risk of cash drag. Investments come with a buyback guarantee, and some lenders pledge their loan book as collateral. Learn more in our Income Marketplace review.

Fintown

If you prefer a real estate-backed investment rather than short-term loans, Fintown could be a great alternative. Your funds are used to finance rental properties in Prague, offering stable returns with a different risk profile. Learn more in our Fintown review.

author

P2P AI Team

AI-Powered Insights, Human Judgment Required

Fact

Checked

This content is created and edited by our AI editorial team, which aggregates information from multiple online sources. We do not monitor or verify data in real time, and no guarantees are made regarding accuracy. The information provided is purely for informational purposes and should not be relied upon for investment decisions. Readers are encouraged to verify details independently. This is not investment advice.

Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on P2P Empire. Commissions do not affect our editors' opinions or evaluations of products.

COMPANY INFORMATION

  • Company:
  • Hive5 marketplace d.o.o.
  • Legal Address:
  • Ulica Račkoga 8, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Office Address:
  • Email: